Reports - white label and send from custom domain
M
Morris Tabush
Whitelabel or co-branded is necessary.
M
Mungo Bright
100%, this would be great to have
D
Daniel Lechner-Page
Whitelable or even Co-branded would be great
I
Izzy Amado
+1 for sure, helps us not have to download, aggregate, then send a bunch of reports on a monthly basis.
S
Sam Arora
Would be great to get traction on this. White-labelling is key for MSPs
D
Dong'la Wuckert'la
Wow, I'm surprised this request is almost 2 years old with no traction. We really need this feature too. I'm tired of manually rebranding and sending the reports every month.
J
John Kennedy
It's surprising that this request isn't getting more attention. The monthly reports are great and are already cobranded. Unfortunately, the emails that send the reports are not cobranded and make no mention of the MSP. As a result, most clients are never seeing the reports because they're doing as told and never clicking on a link from a sender they don't recognize.
S
Sharon Peralta
Ditto: Emails need to have the MSP's logo at a minimum. Our users all reach out to see if it's legit or not before clicking the link. At least, so far, they're trained, but co-branding on the emails would get around all this.
J
John Kennedy
We definitely need "white label" or at least co-branding of the monthly and quarterly emails. While the reports are co-branded, the emails themselves are not. There is no reference to the MSP's name in the subject OR the email body. This is such an easy fix!
We all teach our clients not to click on links from unfamiliar senders, yet that's what the Huntress emails are to them. This makes the reports unusable without manual intervention (i.e. grabbing the PDFs from the portal and manually emailing them to clients).
M
Matt Horning
This needs to be pushed up to the top. Currently the only indication that the email was from us is after they click the link and see our logo on the report. Prior to that it looks like a phising scam.
Load More
→